Another Hate Crime

Another Hate Crime

Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and Eric Garner are names known common to all this past year. White-on-black crime is taking the forefront in the media, our lives, and our thoughts. Seemingly, these crimes are “finally” getting the media they deserve, yet still white officers and public officials are sponging off of the normative hierarchal institutions our culture has established in which the white male stands on top. In November of 2014, an unarmed Akai Gurley was shot and killed in a dark stairway due to an officers “jitters”. Gurley and his girlfriend took the stairs where Peter Liang fired a shot 14 steps below which ricocheted off the wall and into Gurley’s chest. This shot was a supposed accident. However, he then proceeded to text his union representative and wait over six minutes to radio for help and respond to his commanding officer. Liang was charged with six counts; second-degree manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, assault, reckless endangerment and two counts of official misconduct. Liang’s court date was February 11th and he turned himself in that day. However, he pleaded not guilty, was released and does not have to pay bond. But don’t worry; if Liang is convicted of manslaughter again he faces a maximum of 15 years in prison. This sparked a huge controversy in New York, including protests. More on this conviction can be found here.

Meanwhile, thousands of people are arrested everyday for simple misdemeanors and are expected to post bail of at least $500. Often times, these people cannot afford this and they are incarcerated. All the while, taxpayers are paying $9 billion to imprison these defendants who held on bail.

Gurley’s girlfriend, Ballinger, has said, “We’ll keep fighting until justice is served”. Peterson, Gurley’s uncle, was quoted, “What happened to Akai is just egregious. There is no explanation for it,” he said. “We’d like to see justice, and we’d like a change to police policy.” He continues, “There’s an over-policing in communities like ours,” he said. “We are not against police officers. They are following a policy, an egregious policy, and we’re trying to bring attention to that.”

Gurley’s uncle’s comment particularly interests me. He argues that their population is over policed. What is interesting is that Waquant states that the recent hyper-ghetto is more dangerous which is not naturally associated with “too many” police. He says it has lost its buffer and is more dangerous and less protected. To interpret this in the context of Waquant, I read this statement as public authorities trying to regulate ghetto crime and essentially keep it in place. My guess is that in relation to this article, the police are acting in a way that contains the crime rate in this designated “black” area rather than preventing it. This consolidates racial differences into a dichotomy, which organizes color lines into main divisions because of hegemonic institutions. Racial projects allow for objectification and break down and organizes race. It might be able to be said that the police use objectification as their racial project to contain the “black community” within their community (Omni and Winant).

While the rate of media attention is being drawn to black and white hate crime, I still believe it is astounding how hierarchical the system seems. Our institutions prevent social mobility due to the lack of resources for education, lack of jobs available for financial stability, etc. In essence, how racial formation is created, inhabited and transformed is due to our hierarchical institutions. It’s baffling to me what one can get away with because of something as subjective as your class status or skin color.

I also found the fact that Liang was released without bond interesting. Today, according to Waquant, prisons are racialized and have become like a ghetto. More than half of the prison population is black. I thought this situation displayed perfectly reasons why this is the case. One could argue (though obviously not guaranteed) Liang was released due to his status. Many white males and females are released because of the stereotypical institutions that are associated with their race. However, often times, blacks are not allowed that luxury. The stigma and racial category does not give them credibility often in the courts eyes. Also, due to the lack of social mobility and the efforts to “contain” the ghetto community, they are not afforded the opportunity of a stronger education or work options and thus, crime becomes more natural.

I understand I am taking a hard stance on a subject that only has three witnesses. It is the word of two officers and a woman who lost the man she loved. Because of this I realize that it is difficult to truly indict someone. I understand that this could easily be argued as an example but even so, it is impossible to ignore the rising problems or crimes that happen just like Liang’s. However, I think this situation highlights our recent class discussions well.

I would definitely be interested in others thoughts!


3 thoughts on “Another Hate Crime

  1. I find this post to be really fascinating for several reasons. First, I agree that it definitely highlights many of the issues that we have been talking about. I do not dispute the fact that if it were a black man facing charges, he likely would have had bail set or gotten jail time. However, when I pulled up the article, I was initially shocked because I expected to see a picture of a “stereotypical White man” but instead saw an Asian man. I find it interesting that you use a Black and White dichotomy because I think that many would define the case as one involving two minorities. There are also different views that one can take on in this case. I think that the issues of race heavily come into play after the victim has already been shot. It is likely that Liang shot his gun before even learning the race of his victim. However, rather than focusing on helping the man that he shot, I think he went into panic mode because he realized that he was going to become the next top story of police brutality. We have all seen the media portrayal of these events. As much as the media has helped shed light on the racial issues that America still faces, it also has created a lot of tension between police and racial minorities. In this instance, I think that the Liang realized what his actions would look like and then took steps to try to help himself (texting the union rep) rather than helping a man who could have possibly been saved.

    Bottom line, these events are hardly ever a binary of “good versus evil”. I do not believe that Liang intended for this man to die, but the fact that he was not sentenced to jail time and was let go without bond is astounding. He did not follow through with what he was trained to do (medical assistance), and for that he should have been punished in some fashion. However, he was not punished and this can be taken as yet another example of the racial disparities that we are facing in the U.S.


    1. I think you are correct in that the issues of race come after he was shot. While the fact Liang was frightened and shot a black man is controversial, I believe that the importance of the case comes from the fact that he was let “off the hook”. I personally do not think he shot Gurley because of his race. The fact that Liang did not follow protocol and was still found not guilty and additionally Gurley was criminalized as a black man in a “sketchy stare well” just emphasizes the disparity.
      I too found Liang’s ethnicity very interesting! I used a white v. black dichotomy because in the articles I read, I felt that emphasis as well. My interest was not in who shot a black man, it was that the black man was criminalized. What I thought was most interesting while reading the article was that I also initially assumed that Liang was a stereotypical white police figure. I was shocked when I learned he was of Asian descent. However, what I appreciate from this scenario is that it does not simply emphasize white on black tension, it emphasizes the prejudice towards blacks specifically. Arguable, blacks are stereotypically associated with crime more so than a person of Asian descent. I just found the fact that Liang was Asian (minority) and still given more power than Gurley and that this crime was still associated with white on black hate on the local news very interesting. I’m glad you pointed that out as well!! I am not sure of the importance or logic behind this but I’d be interested to hear your thoughts!


  2. The city usually does a good job on snow removal. The big problem is people ar18;#n2e7&t happy no mater what you do. It’s to large to keep everyone happy.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s